Not a bad site - quite nicely laid out. The front page is informative, although I personally don’t like the image they’ve used. I think they’ve put too many options in their top menu, and they’re lacking any ‘news’.
It’s a good start, but I think there’s some work still to be done
Robert Adams on May 4, 2007
@ mrben - How important is a “news” section on a church site? For my church site that I operate, we had a news section for a while, but it was never updated. In cases where certain parts of a church website are not managed frequently, is it okay to pull the plug with that feature - whether it be “news” or any other type of content?
I see that having a “news” section can be beneficial, but wouldn’t see how ineffective it would be for a church site to not have one.
Greg on July 15, 2008
Simple clean website… what I can’t get pastis the logo. very bad :(
RB on January 13, 2009
Think just a plain text “logo” would be better and fit better than what is there? Great site, terrible logo…
Tim on November 26, 2009
It appears that this church has been forced to cut back… or for some reason decided to go with a less expensive provider. The NEW site isn’t even the class of the reference photo.