Not a bad site - quite nicely laid out. The front page is informative, although I personally don’t like the image they’ve used. I think they’ve put too many options in their top menu, and they’re lacking any ‘news’.
It’s a good start, but I think there’s some work still to be done
Robert Adams on May 4, 2007
@ mrben - How important is a “news” section on a church site? For my church site that I operate, we had a news section for a while, but it was never updated. In cases where certain parts of a church website are not managed frequently, is it okay to pull the plug with that feature - whether it be “news” or any other type of content?
I see that having a “news” section can be beneficial, but wouldn’t see how ineffective it would be for a church site to not have one.
Comments
mrben on May 4, 2007
Not a bad site - quite nicely laid out. The front page is informative, although I personally don’t like the image they’ve used. I think they’ve put too many options in their top menu, and they’re lacking any ‘news’.
It’s a good start, but I think there’s some work still to be done
Robert Adams on May 4, 2007
@ mrben - How important is a “news” section on a church site? For my church site that I operate, we had a news section for a while, but it was never updated. In cases where certain parts of a church website are not managed frequently, is it okay to pull the plug with that feature - whether it be “news” or any other type of content?
I see that having a “news” section can be beneficial, but wouldn’t see how ineffective it would be for a church site to not have one.
Greg on July 15, 2008
Simple clean website… what I can’t get pastis the logo. very bad :(