Not feeling this one. Anyone with a 1024 x 768 sees nothing but the navigation & top flash rotator. Maybe that was their intent? I must be accustomed to reading Think they could of used their space better “above the fold”.
Andrew on April 23, 2009
well.. I think the design is nice. I agree there wasn’t much thought put into the fact that most ppl are on 1024x768.... Bad move.. also, Colin, the rotating image section isn’t flash. which was a good move. But hey, the site isn’t really made for the end user any way.. It’s made to look good on the designers screen.. lol. So it doesn’t really matter if it looks good on a mobile device… such as an iPhone…
anyway, i like the design, some good ideas with the css.
Comments
Colin Rowley on April 16, 2009
Not feeling this one. Anyone with a 1024 x 768 sees nothing but the navigation & top flash rotator. Maybe that was their intent? I must be accustomed to reading
Think they could of used their space better “above the fold”.
Andrew on April 23, 2009
well.. I think the design is nice. I agree there wasn’t much thought put into the fact that most ppl are on 1024x768.... Bad move.. also, Colin, the rotating image section isn’t flash. which was a good move. But hey, the site isn’t really made for the end user any way.. It’s made to look good on the designers screen.. lol. So it doesn’t really matter if it looks good on a mobile device… such as an iPhone…
anyway, i like the design, some good ideas with the css.